Jab brought ‘unprecedentedly strong responses’ in patients whose disease had become resistant to chemotherapy and immunotherapy

In an international trial spanning 11 countries, the injection was offered to patients whose cancer had spread or come back and whose disease had failed to respond to other treatments.

In the trial, 102 patients with head and neck cancer, the world’s sixth most common cancer, were given the jab. Tumours shrank or disappeared completely in 43 patients, including 28 whose tumours shrank significantly and 15 who saw them eradicated entirely.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 5 months ago (5 children)

England has referred to vaccines as jabs long before it started to be used as a pejorative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    I remember reading somewhere that (especially) Russian disinformation campaigns learned British English. They, pretending to be American anti-vaxxers, spread it to the dialect of the dumbest Americans.

    'Jab' is basically a case study in skipped localization.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    But this drug is not a vaccine.

    If you do not understand the difference between a monoclonal antibody and a vaccine, fuck off down voters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago*

    The medical sense of “jab”, meanwhile, has a rather less salubrious origin, as a 1914 dictionary of criminal slang introduces it: “Jab, current amongst morphine and cocaine fiends. A hypodermic injection.”

    —https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/feb/04/why-do-we-call-vaccinations-jabs

  • source
  • parent