As a not quite middle aged dude, I only just now figured out how to see magic eye stuff. I tried a couple times in elementary school but didn't get it so I stopped. Had a few drinks earlier, stumbled on some magic eye pic that I could see clear as day and it blew my mind a little

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Absolutely loved them as a kid! Had a quite a few books.

You can do them two different ways. The normal way with the object popping out towards you and an inverted way with crossing your eyes that inverts the shape.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I'm pretty sure I did it the cross eyed way. I'm doo trunk to understand how to do it another way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Bring the page close to your nose, let your eyes kinda naturally loose focus from distance. Then slowly start to pull the page back and you should get it.

    Kinda difficult to describe.

    Check back when you are sober and see if you get it to work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Maybe I have it mixed up then because the way I'm doing it is losing focus and letting it adjust until I see something. I thought I was going crosseyed but I didn't have a mirror so I can't be sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The way this works is that the image is designed to appear 'beyond' the surface it is printed on. It's much easier to relax your eyes and pretend you're looking at what's 'behind' the paper. Kind of like 3d chalk art on the road in a way.

    The other way of crossing your eyes works because you're swapping the left and right eye, which gives a different, inverted appearance. Instead of a foreground image popping out of the background, it looks like the other way. Like looking in a box, kinda.

    I can do both, but the latter is more difficult, sometimes requires a specific distance, and can be painful if you force it. If the image is too big, you may only be able to see a part of it. I think the first method is easier to do and to learn/train. Either way, you aren't looking at what's 'on the surface'.

    ...

    The best way I can explain is: pretend you're sitting on the toilet, really tired and you have nothing to look at so you just lose focus and gaze at random stuff. When the tiles or cracks start to make pictures that aren't there, that's kind of the effect you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I'm fairly certain I'm doing the distance thing but at the same time I am fairly certain I am looking inside a 3d box

    https://www.reddit.com/r/MagicEye/s/ogZeqQWwpY

    That's the piece that made it click for me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Oh that one is a good one, it's very busy. Using the first method the trees are on the 'bottom' and everything progressively pops out with the fish/turtle on 'top'.

    The other way is reverse, the trees are on the 'top' and the fish are on the 'bottom' (like I'm looking in that 'box'). It's also really hard to see the whole picture this way, but that's just me.

    Also, 'In a Box' might not be the best analogy, you can make one that intentionally feels like you're looking inside something -- it's just that most of these are made to pop out at you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    For the cross eye version you just need to hold out the page at normal viewing distance and cross your eyes till the 3d image pops.

    Sounds like you are doing it the regular way. Which is the more difficult one for most people that have issues with magic eyes.

    Glad you got to experience them!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm glad too, I have so many things to look at now lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    This works, but the quicker method for me was to hold the book over my head, out of my line of sight while I focused my eyes on something a little farther away (a few feet away is fine). Then you can simply move the book downward into your field of vision while refusing to let your eyes refocus. It should be blurry, because you're still focusing past it, despite it being right in front of your face. Then just relax and let your brain do the work.

    This method got by far the quickest and most reliable results for me, most pop suddenly into view in just a couple seconds.

    I think this method works best because you're using established muscle memory to focus your eyes on an object at a measurable, consistent distance, and then just not letting them change. Removes several variables from the equation.

  • source
  • parent