A Texas county devastated by deadly flooding earlier this month rejected federal funds in 2021 that could have helped install a flood warning system, with local officials and residents arguing they didn't want to be "bought" by the Biden administration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 61 points 1 year ago (18 children)

It's too bad children had to lose their lives to their parent's Maga bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    MAGA children usually grow up to be MAGA adults

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    You're spectacularly wrong there. It's like anything else. Sometimes kids turn out to be clones of their parents, sometimes they turn into the opposite, or even something better. Pretty shitty mindset.

    Either way, I hope you don't cut yourself on that edge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Of course you're right that kids can turn out to be completely different from their parents, but they do have a huge disadvantage when they grow up hearing everyone around them spew hate and lies. Getting out of that requires exposure to new ideas and an openness to embracing them.

    I know a teenager who is really struggling to make sense of the world outside of his parents insanity. He has already learned alcoholism from them, but we'll see if he keeps hating gays and "Mexicans" too... Poor kid is a mess. Fun fact: his dad is a cop. Will wonders never cease?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -18 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Yeah, good thing all the kids of Trump turned against him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Keyword: Saying someone is spectacularly wrong, then mentioning that they are 50% right. 1D chess move

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I never implied a 50% ratio. You did all on your own because you lack reading comprehension.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago

    I see 2x sometimes, so I assumed it is a 50% ratio. In the end it does not matter. How can someone be fully wrong, if the outcome is not 100% guaranteed? That is just some logic on a new dimension

  • source
  • parent