you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 5 months ago (6 children)

More fan-fiction and post-hoc justifications. You seriously need to read some historically accurate accounts of what happened at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    I have read historically accurate accounts, though you define historical accuracy by it not being written by anyone succeeding. I've also asked for sources, and you haven't brought any beyond linking the anarchist library.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    History written by the winners is ok according to you as long as you agree with it. That is really funny.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago*

    Surely none of the losers of history have ever lost for good reason and stayed mad about it. Let's all renounce modern medicine and pledge loyalty to the Khmer Rouge, because they too were crushed by the awful communists.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Nah, history is written by both winners and losers. What's important is historical accuracy, and which class's perspective and outlook is being presented. Equating socialist historiography with bourgeois historiography is a false equivalence.

  • source
  • parent