you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 5 months ago* (8 children)

/remindme 3 years
They will most likely catch up like they are doing for electric for electric cars now.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    For the Hardware, yes.

    But hardware is less than half the battle. Intel found this out the hard way. 3 times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (3 children)

    I would think software is even easier to catch up because you don't need as much physical investment and experimenting is way cheaper, especially with LLM helping to learn now. I think DeepSeek is an example.
    Innovation is difficult, but simply catching up with all the public research and open source solutions, not as much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    oh god we will have vibecoded gpu drivers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    We already do. All the corporate contributions to Linux kernel (including by Intel and AMD) lately have come with advertisements that they were "assisted" by copilot/claude/codex. Tech corpos are desperate to show to the world how they are using ai all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Literally Google IO this year.

    They showed off an OS they allegedly vibecoded with antigravity, tried to get it to run Doom, failed due to missing graphics drivers, then vibecoded the missing drivers live.

    I was equal parts appalled and impressed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    It seems the only thing the West is successfully out competing china in is income and wealth inequality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments