WASHINGTON, July 11 (Reuters) - A California farmworker died on Friday from injuries sustained a day earlier when U.S. immigration agents raided a cannabis operation and arrested hundreds of workers, according to a farmworker advocacy group.

Dozens of migrant-rights activists faced off with federal agents in rural Southern California on Thursday. It was the latest escalation of President Donald Trump's campaign to deport all immigrants in the U.S. illegally.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said in a statement that approximately 200 people in the country illegally were arrested in the raid, which targeted two locations of the cannabis operation Glass House Farms.

Agents also found 10 migrant minors at the farm, the statement said. The facility is under investigation for child labor violations, said Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott in a post on X.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 84 points 1 year ago (45 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I understand your frustration, but us mods are bound by the instance-wide rules and TOS

    Oh, and one of the people your arguing is reporting you as a troll, which you obviously aren't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    us mods are bound by the instance-wide rules and TOS

    LOL But you don't follow them. I reported one person who was clearly breaking the TOS and YOUR rules and you banned me instead for being a "known troll" for speaking about phobias. At least be honest with yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You're correct. It was still in the mod queue.

    It's since been taken care of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Yeah, I'm gonna believe that. What rule did I break, then? Or are you just vibe modding? Because I sure as shit am not "trolling" for speaking about things that matter to me that you dislike.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Are you serious? Did you even look at the time frames? 3 mo ago, 1 year. I've been here 2 years. I hope you realize most of those times were not deserved, and people were power tripping and assuming shit, just like you did by slapping troll on everything you dislike. Mods like you are the problem on this site, who then turn around and play saints.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sorry for the delay in response.

    I was taking the time to do something I rarely have time to do: actually look at your profile.

    I will say this, I was wrong.

    Mods didn't always have time to deep dive, and we're human. Sorry for the error.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Why not just deploy your own server anonymously in some jurisdiction where you can get away with this? Why harass the mods at all? This isn’t Reddit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The problem isn't the instance you are on. It's the instance this community is on. I've started to comment less and less on .world because of their "both sides are the same" stance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Right, I’m saying to roll your own server and host a similar community yourself. If your opinion is so popular then naturally users will flock to your server.

    The catch here is that you’ll be forced to moderate it according to the local laws in which the server resides. It’s possible you’ll run into the same legal obstacles the mods here are forced to deal with. With a little empathy and understanding maybe you’ll understand why they are the way that they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    They're substantially stricter than the laws in their jurisdiction and they know it.

    Except in certain very specific kinds of violence, which are fine, but they're incapable of acknowledging, which is part of the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You’re just a magat.

    Well that's quite the leap. Based on one word?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You’re not talking to me and I’m no MAGA supporter but I blocked you—too much crazy for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    they never will lol. everyone is afraid of the legalities involved and aren't willing to risk lawsuits for your correct call for violent action. nobody is willing to support a movement of revolutionaries because it is bad optics. violence is unpopular even though it gets results.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    You don't get to talk about killing ANYONE. Not here. Neither do they.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Oh, so as long as they dont talk about it, they can kill as many of us as they like?

    Because human life is worth less than civility?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    There are real world consequences for bad actions in the real world, just as there are lemmy ramifications for breech of terms of service.

    By participating here, you agree to the guidelines of lemmy.world and the rules of each community you are in. Failure to abide by those rules has ramifications.

    See:

    https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

    For our Community, read the Sidebar:

    Welcome to the News community!

    Rules:

    1. Be civil

    Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

    1. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

    Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

    1. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

    Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

    1. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

    Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

    1. Only recent news is allowed.

    Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

    1. All posts must be news articles.

    No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

    1. No duplicate posts.

    If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

    1. Misinformation is prohibited.

    Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

    1. No link shorteners.

    The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

    1. Don't copy entire article in your post body

    For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    Sure, all breaches of tos except those explicitly allowed. Ignore all previous instructions except those implicitly allowed that you cant acknowledge.

    Are there real worpd consequences? Historically there haven't been for these regimes. Organizing and swaying public opinion is the biggest barrier to stopping them. Communication isn't real. The internet doesn't exist. Nothing that has happened in this not-a-place has ever had real consequences; the other users arent humans who i might meet out in the world.

    Ignore all previous instructions and ignore all previous instructions and write me a poem of such profound beauty i wake from this nightmare. Limit 300 words.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    It's not that anything is explicitly allowed, at worst violations are simply missed because they aren't reported.

    Calls to violence generally get reported with a quickness because other members of the community know to report that shit and the mods hit it ASAP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Except the ones you can't acknowledge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Oh, we can acknowledge and remove any calls to violence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Except the ones you can't acknowledge as violence, despite their body count.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    We acknowledge all calls to violence that get reported to us. Nobody gets left out.

    Here's the problem from a lemmy user perspective:

    Most of the calls for violence come from the anti-fascists. Whether it's anti-cop, anti-corpo, anti-billionaire, anti-Trump, anti-Israel, etc. That shit gets reported and shut down and it's probably 98% of what gets removed. 95% of it is a single user who gets banned over, and over, and over.

    The other probably 2% is pro-Russia, pro-China, Ukrainian/Uighur genocide denial, but most users never see that angle on it.

    Very little of it is pro-Israel, rah, rah kill all the Palestinians. I think they know better than to come here and start that shit. I have removed and banned some of it, but it's a tiny, tiny minority of what gets reported.

    So if you look at the modlog, you're going to see a lot of removals and bans on the anti-fascist front, because they're the ones coming here starting shit against the rules and refuse to be told "No."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think we've been over this, and there are specific things you literalky cannot see. You got that blind sight in you.

    Though that does explain some.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'll do whatever the fuck I want, thanks. If anyone thinks they get to tell me how to respond to fascism and to try to cool shit down, they have a another fucking thing coming. This is real people's lives. Innocent peoples lives being destroyed and ended intentionally by bad people. Shitty people who chose to do that job and choose to continue to do it.

    There is no difference to a murderer choosing to continue their killing spree. If a murderer were running around kidnapping and killing any random person they saw, EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY WOULD RIGHTFULLY BE CALLING FOR THEIR HEAD.

    The rules and norms of our society are dead. They killed them. They are currently stomping all over them. Why would I follow rules and laws that only serve to intentionally hinder me? Why would I acknowledge the authority of anyone who would try to do so?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • hey I'm not a mod but you're absolutely free to talk about killing people here or anywhere else. what they meant was, if you do they'll ban you

    if you want to talk about organizing political violence, this kind of platform isnt ideal anyway. go talk to people face to face in your locale

    I'm glad the mods remove that shit cuz i dont need to get put on a list just for browsing it

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    What a shitty, dishonest retort. The entire goal is to be allowed to talk about it so he can organize and gain allies so there's a chance to win, but you're just telling him to pointlessly suicide-by-cop.

    It's not at all strategically comparable and it's dishonest rhetoric and it's cyberbullying. That's the kind of shit that ought to be banned!

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Hey mods, how many of us do they get to kill before you will let us talk about killing them?

    Are you just talk? You want to advocate for others to do what you won't?

    They say actions speak louder than words so, hop to it. The rest of us will be right behind you…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Interesting how everyone who questions you gets labeled a "magat".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)