▲ 381 ▼ AI coders think they’re 20% faster — but they’re actually 19% slower (pivot-to-ai.com) submitted 1 year ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems 102 comments fedilink hide all child comments podcast version video version
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 21 points 1 year ago (2 children) Paragraph 2: METR funded 16 experienced open-source developers with “moderate AI experience” to do what they do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HedyL@awful.systems 27 points 1 year ago ... and just a few paragraphs further down: The number of people tested in the study was n=16. That’s a small number. But it’s a lot better than the usual AI coding promotion, where n=1 ’cos it’s just one guy saying “I’m so much faster now, trust me bro. No, I didn’t measure it.” I wouldn't call that "burying information". permalink fedilink source parent [–] swlabr@awful.systems 14 points 1 year ago . Debate me bro? (jk) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HedyL@awful.systems 27 points 1 year ago ... and just a few paragraphs further down: The number of people tested in the study was n=16. That’s a small number. But it’s a lot better than the usual AI coding promotion, where n=1 ’cos it’s just one guy saying “I’m so much faster now, trust me bro. No, I didn’t measure it.” I wouldn't call that "burying information". permalink fedilink source parent