you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 6 months ago (6 children)

I guess I just disagree. IMO, that’s not his responsibility.

Cheers, mate!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    That's fair, but what is the point of hiring a leader of a party if they're not going to lead that party? The democrats have had that problem since I've been alive. They seem to always just hope some charismatic person arises instead having a true direction. It's an inherent problem with being a "big tent" party. Trying to please everyone you end up pleasing no one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (4 children)

    No, that is his only responsibility. He was a servant of the people, not the other fucking way around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    And he served the people until his term ended, no?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments