160
It ensures that the agent does a good job (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/46800674

Image Text:

Github overview of a pull request for the file AGENTS.md.

Comments regarding line "# Repository Guidelines" in the file:

zanieb: "What's the point of this title? Seems like wasted tokens?"

zanieb: "(certainly inconsequential in the big scheme, but I don't see it adding value)"

charliemarsh: "It ensures that the agent does a good job."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

You are a monster. Nice work!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Ah, went and checked my work laptop this morning. It’s actually set to: !”git reset —hard HEAD && git clean -fdx

    git it is the one that’s set to upstream.

    I also have git some: add -p, git away: checkout -p, git out: !”git merge —abort 2> /dev/null || git rebase —abort 2> /dev/null #”

    And some complicated ones I’m not gonna type on my phone:

    • git on <foo> where foo is either “it”, in which case I use the appropriate main/master/develop branch and rebase on it; or foo is “up” in which case I do a pull —rebase and play a short audio clip of Get On Up; or foo is a nonexistent branch, in which case I massage the requested branch name to adhere to some conventions and then make a new branch and set the remote tracking branch
    • git with <foo> where the same “it” logic applies but it’s a merge; or foo is a commit SHA and it gets cherry-picked
    • git up is just a pull but it plays a short audio clip of Get On Up
    • I think I had a git rekt at one point, but I think it just did the same as git gud so I deleted it
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent