you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

I feel like this whole HDMI 2.1 thing is only an issue for a minority of people with ultra high end expensive monitors, and is overblown as a result.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    4K 120Hz is a really common TV input and even this is not possible in HDMI 2.0 without 4:2:0 chroma subsampling which is visually lossy especially in desktop usage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I'd wager that people who have linux and are plugging in TVs to run at 4k 120 are probably also not significantly in the majority.

    i mean, sure, do it, we deserve to have feature parity with windows, but its not a problem that is affecting the masses.

  • source
  • parent