My take on a new alignment. Curious if others agree with my placements.

Alginement chart. Top is "Believes humans are self-interested," bottom is "Believes humans are altruistic," left is "Seeks well-being for all humans," right is "seeks well-being for humans with merit." Top left includes Left Communists, Classical Marxists, Keynesians, Libertarian Municipalists and Proudhonists. Top right includes Rothbardians, Objectivists, Ricardian Socialists, Marxist-Leninists, and Individual Anarachists. Bottom left includes Anarcha-Feminists, Christian Socialists, Anarcho-Monarchists, Voluntaryists, and Christian Anarchists. Bottom right includes Technocrasists, Fascists, and Philanthrocapitalists.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

everyone on the lower rungs of society being obedient, and a fascist directly benefitting from taking control of a country.. are seen as altruism? truly wild!

personally, i'd prefer an alignment chart that sticks to "altruistic" versus "self-interested", since this shows how skewed it can get when people are convinced that horrible things they're doing are for the greater good 😬

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    Not altruistic in terms of trying to benefit everyone; altruistic in terms of expecting people to unselfishly serve the nation. This is the ideology, not the reality obviously.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    That's not altruism and shouldn't be defined as such. It's nationalism and is ultimately a selfish view.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments