you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 6 months ago (5 children)

You're thinking on the right questions..

It took years, but finally I realized the appropriate threshold is simply to have people go on an exercize-bike/meter, for a 90-minute-session, & have them sustain what they can, for that duration, then multiply their RMS-output ( root-mean-square rounds-down ) by 3x, & make that THEIR motor-limit:

This means that you don't get flimsy 50-lbs children with 750-w of bike-motor, & you also don't hobble linebackers ( I think that's what they're called: NFL tackles? ) with the same limit you're putting on small/flimsy ones.

Proportionate to the strength you wield when managing your own body, see?

So, for many reasonably-strong riders, it'd be .. around 300-w, tbh..

Alot of people would hate me for making the limit sooo close to their own physical-strength, but .. live longer.

& simply make another limit, higher, & require license-plate for that category.

I'd make it so that within the 25-kph & 3x-sustained-90-minutes-wattage, no license-plate is required: you get a photo-ID card which says you don't need a plate.

More power, more speed? then you need a plate.

Some cities need 40-kph to do the parkways, & that'd have to be one of the limits.

60-kph would be needed for other parkways, but that'd be absolute-limit, & some body-armor would be reasonable at that speed ( since crash-energy goes up with the square of the speed ).

Having been a courier, I'd put an either-speed-XOR-weight limit on them, so the fast-light people can get that, but the heavy-cargo couriers get a slower-speed, .. I"m not the only courier who discovered that it's .. an experience that many couriers have had .. to discover that one has been biking, in traffic, while unconscious. Sleep-biking. And I want that NOT happening at high-speed.

So, this is all like graduated-licensing, but done vertically, instead of temporally.

_ /\ _

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Um, no.

    Hi, we're disabled.

    Don't try to restrict us from using stuff that helps bypass the disability, thanks.

    -- Frost

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not tying to restrict you from using stuff that helps bypass disability.

    I'm trying to have more-likely-to-kill-someone behaviors more-licensed.

    Ignore that distinction if your ideology wants..

    _ /\ _

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    No, what you're doing is tying people's speed to what their specific body can produce rather than what is safe. Those are two very different things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Not what I meant:

    I'm tying power to the power that the bicyclist can naturally produce.

    I'm tying speed to licensing-level, because crash-energy goes up with the square of the speed.

    Physically-weak? THEN small-motor.

    Linebacker? THEN huge-motor.

    Speeds are tied to licensing.

    I'm not tying speed to body-force, I'm tying it to licensing-level/competence-carefulness.

    Don't know how I fucked-up the communication so bad, but sorry.

    _ /\ _

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Okay, but you're still talking like tying power to people's body energy output is a good thing. Speed, power, whatever, limiting our machine capability just because our body is limited (preventing working around disability) is an asshole move.

  • source
  • parent