What the Russmedia ruling means for ActivityPub and atproto.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Ah, so it's your blog. Thanks for acknowledging that these are indeed just your thoughts right now.

But - maybe you can see it from the comments: people take it further and next thing you know they post "GDPR made Fediverse illegal" or some such bullshit.

That's the power of publication. Not necessarily a good thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    yeah i get what you mean, its been something ive been thinking about. the title itself is already deliberate, because the legal problem already exists: while it is uncertain what the Russmedia ruling does for federation and social platforms regarding GDPR, that uncertainty itself already does pose a major problem.

    in the article itself i have an entire section on the uncertainty, and what might limit Russmedia's reach. A lot actually hinges on what the outcome of the Kunast case will be.

    thats why i published it now, and with this title. Because right now federation does have a legal problem, with the problem being the uncertainty itself. After Kunast there might either be a much bigger problem (Russmedia confirmed to generalise to social platforms) or a much smaller problem

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago

    There has always been a tension between GDPR and the Fediverse; more generally, between European laws and the Internet. That's why Europe doesn't have the Big Tech companies. Europe demands a lot of control over the sharing of data. That's difficult to reconcile with the decentralized nature of the Fediverse, or the Internet as a whole. The Künast case is really only one example.

  • source
  • parent