We don't usually take into account what employees do to nature on their spare time.

In a way, we would have to equate all the money spent on employees and what it is used for.

Getting rid of an employee would surely be a net gain for the environment, right? If an LLM could offset 50 employees, perhaps that would be neutral in that sense.

This doesn't make a lot of sense, esoecially morally. We can't really blame the company for what employees do out of work, can we?