▲ 763 ▼ Sean Murray explaining what the No Man's Sky team has really been up to (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works 56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) So if you can reduce compute there then you save money. There is no technical difficulty. It's a business decision. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) right now they're dynamically generating subtitles every time. that's way more compute. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aow@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) For real? That's incredibly dumb/expensive compared to one subtitle roll. Can you share where you saw that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 1 year ago* well, i have no evidence of this. however. looking at the way auto-generated subtitles are served at youtube right now, they are sent individually word-by-word from the server, pick up filler words like "uh", and sometimes pause for several seconds in the middle of sentences. and they're not sent by websocket, which means they go through multiple requests over the course of a video. more requests means the server works harder because it can't just stream the text like it does the video, and the only reason they'd do that other than incompetence (which would surely have been corrected by now, it's been like this for years) is if the web backend has to wait for the next word to be generated. i would love to actually know what's going on if anyone has any insight. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) right now they're dynamically generating subtitles every time. that's way more compute. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aow@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) For real? That's incredibly dumb/expensive compared to one subtitle roll. Can you share where you saw that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 1 year ago* well, i have no evidence of this. however. looking at the way auto-generated subtitles are served at youtube right now, they are sent individually word-by-word from the server, pick up filler words like "uh", and sometimes pause for several seconds in the middle of sentences. and they're not sent by websocket, which means they go through multiple requests over the course of a video. more requests means the server works harder because it can't just stream the text like it does the video, and the only reason they'd do that other than incompetence (which would surely have been corrected by now, it's been like this for years) is if the web backend has to wait for the next word to be generated. i would love to actually know what's going on if anyone has any insight. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aow@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) For real? That's incredibly dumb/expensive compared to one subtitle roll. Can you share where you saw that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 1 year ago* well, i have no evidence of this. however. looking at the way auto-generated subtitles are served at youtube right now, they are sent individually word-by-word from the server, pick up filler words like "uh", and sometimes pause for several seconds in the middle of sentences. and they're not sent by websocket, which means they go through multiple requests over the course of a video. more requests means the server works harder because it can't just stream the text like it does the video, and the only reason they'd do that other than incompetence (which would surely have been corrected by now, it's been like this for years) is if the web backend has to wait for the next word to be generated. i would love to actually know what's going on if anyone has any insight. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 1 year ago* well, i have no evidence of this. however. looking at the way auto-generated subtitles are served at youtube right now, they are sent individually word-by-word from the server, pick up filler words like "uh", and sometimes pause for several seconds in the middle of sentences. and they're not sent by websocket, which means they go through multiple requests over the course of a video. more requests means the server works harder because it can't just stream the text like it does the video, and the only reason they'd do that other than incompetence (which would surely have been corrected by now, it's been like this for years) is if the web backend has to wait for the next word to be generated. i would love to actually know what's going on if anyone has any insight. permalink fedilink source parent