cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/63262827

Chanting ‘from the river to the sea’ would be criminalised under proposed state law

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 8 points 6 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago*

    Israel has a right to exist in it's original borders.

    What "original" borders? The borders they established in 1948 by ethnically cleansing Palestinian land? The historical borders of Judea and Samaria? If so which ones? Are we going to rely on the historiagraphy of Israelis who determined those historical borders too? Why should we legitimize an explicitly settler colonial project who has only caused problems for an entire region since its inception? What even gives a state the "right to exist".

    I agree that we need an organized international intervention but we should also seriously investigate the purpose of Israel. Who benefits from its continue existence and why is incredibly important to determining what to do going forward. I am of the opinion that a two state solution only leaves us where we were a few decades ago. It allows the settlers to bide their time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Words incite violence. Every genocide starts with rethoric. We have t8 curtail speech. Everything else is 18th century naivité.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    That's a naive take. The right to life, health and a peace for million of people is paramount to some hateful bigots right to free speech.

    Human rights can conflict with eachother. We have to make a choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments