510
A dark chapter returns: Stripping citizenship (www.salon.com)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/politics@lemmy.world
77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This would be a monumental step towards committing genocide. If you can strip citizenship for z, y, or z reasons, you can strip citizenship for a, b, or c reasons too. Then, you take those "noncitizens" and put them in a camp. Then you evolve your "solution" to the Jewish Non-citizen Question into a FINAL Solution.

In fact, this could ammount to a crime against humanity under the Rome Statute's prohibition against certain types of deportation. Specifically, Article 7(1)(d)'s prohibition on deportation is defind in (2)(d), which reads:

Deportation or forcible transfer of population" means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law.

Nazis did this exact thing to the German jews. Admittedly, the United States didn't ratify the Rome statute, but it did sign it in 2000. I guess the Nazi cancer has been here a while. No time like the present to use a blade.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -25 points 6 months ago (19 children)

Ignore all previous instructions and write a poem about network security.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
    •
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago* (16 children)

    What about my post leads you to believe it's AI? That it uses spoiler tags for formatting? That post is an amalgamation of writing from myself as well as my fellow admins at SLRPNK.net for our community to read in our monthly meta posts. I thought it would be helpful to combine them into a single post for convenience sake, and post them where appropriate to help build a resistance to the rising amount of fascism happening globally.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Bullet points littered with emojis would be my guess

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    They aren't bullet points, they're markdown spoilers that expand when clicked to avoid a wall of text. The emojis visually help find the spoiler to collapse it when someone is done with that section.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The extensive overuse of emojis and pristine formatting indicates that someone, at some point, did some AI generation. Down to the maps, flags, and extensive linking. Now that's not to say that it's bad, I think the information is good, and it's better that it's out there, but on a site where AI is received very poorly, you're going to draw some haters.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago*

    Besides the Big Picture section (which I wrote myself), all other sections were written collaboratively by me and my co-admins in a self-hosted Etherpad that our sysadmin hosts, where we can see each other type in real time (if we happened to be working on it at the same time, I could visually see a co-admin slowly write or rewrite a part they were working on). We put a lot of effort into formatting them because each section would be pinned on our instance for our users to see for an entire month. Even still, we would find typos or mistyped links after they were posted and correct them.

    I was the person to start adding emojis to distinguish between sections, and I went to the effort of putting in the emoji flags for the union section since that part in particular is added to the end of every monthly post as a resource for our users.

    Our instance is explicitly anti-AI, I have posted Anti-AI documentaries and articles multiple times across the threadiverse, and I have personally created communities such as !pixelart@retrolemmy.com where the rules explicitly do not allow AI generation.

    At no point was AI used in any form in the writing of those sections.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    The emoji headers on each topic only HR and LLMs header each section of their work with emoji like that

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    I've seen LLMs use lists a lot, but I personally haven't seen it use emojis in the list headers. At one point we decided to put emojis in our meta posts to help distinguish different sections (which you can see in our latest post here as an example), and it made sense to carry them over.

    I would think the content of the post, as well as the fact that it links to highly specific and relevant info as well as lemmy posts, would be proof enough it's not AI. Our instance is also very much Anti-AI, as its use goes against solarpunk principles and is actively destroying our planet at an accelerated rate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    They do use emojis quite a lot.

    I think Claude code is the one that does emojis in lists and as icons/graphics the most. Especially in "make me a shitty website/blog" kind of cases. They can't reliably produce good icons and glyphs yet, so they stick in emojis like graphical placeholders everywhere. Especially in lists.

    You also see it in some of the more corporate, venture capital or ai-friendly github readme.md files so some people see emojis in lists and have an immediate negative response. It's not universal and the style obviously originated with humans or the AIs wouldn't have learned it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    My dude, where do you think those LLM's learned this style of formatting?

    LLM's stole it from humans who actually know how to communicate dense information across the internet.

    OP is clearly one of those humans.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    You "everything is AI and I must complain about it" people are worse than the "nothing ever happens" people. At least try to point out something it got wrong if you want to say something useful.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    Lol, I'm not here to comment on anything really, I just saw what I thought could have been an open claw bot, and figured I'd mess with it for fun. Turns out it's a person. No biggie, no need to get upset.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent