▲ 841 ▼ Federal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027 (www.yahoo.com) submitted 6 months ago by ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to c/technology@lemmy.world 368 comments fedilink hide all child comments I can't. I just can't.
[–] conartistpanda@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (4 children) You failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (3 children) Eh, that seems like falling into the two party fallacy. Plenty of silly in every sub group. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) Fair, I just find the people who want more surveillance because of a vague "protecting the community" to be stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) Oh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell "won't someone think of the children" while taking the most oppressive position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago Fair, Tipper Gore comes to mind. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (3 children) Eh, that seems like falling into the two party fallacy. Plenty of silly in every sub group. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) Fair, I just find the people who want more surveillance because of a vague "protecting the community" to be stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) Oh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell "won't someone think of the children" while taking the most oppressive position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago Fair, Tipper Gore comes to mind. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (3 children) Eh, that seems like falling into the two party fallacy. Plenty of silly in every sub group. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) Fair, I just find the people who want more surveillance because of a vague "protecting the community" to be stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) Oh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell "won't someone think of the children" while taking the most oppressive position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago Fair, Tipper Gore comes to mind. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (3 children) Eh, that seems like falling into the two party fallacy. Plenty of silly in every sub group. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) Fair, I just find the people who want more surveillance because of a vague "protecting the community" to be stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) Oh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell "won't someone think of the children" while taking the most oppressive position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago Fair, Tipper Gore comes to mind. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (3 children) Eh, that seems like falling into the two party fallacy. Plenty of silly in every sub group. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) Fair, I just find the people who want more surveillance because of a vague "protecting the community" to be stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) Oh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell "won't someone think of the children" while taking the most oppressive position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago Fair, Tipper Gore comes to mind. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) Fair, I just find the people who want more surveillance because of a vague "protecting the community" to be stupid. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) Oh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell "won't someone think of the children" while taking the most oppressive position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago Fair, Tipper Gore comes to mind. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) Oh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell "won't someone think of the children" while taking the most oppressive position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago Fair, Tipper Gore comes to mind. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago Fair, Tipper Gore comes to mind. permalink fedilink source parent