36
Smoking ban for people born after 2008 in the UK agreed (www.bbc.co.uk)
submitted 6 months ago by [B] to c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I’m not sure which battle you’re fighting, but this is the wrong one.

Please go hang out with people dying of lung cancer. There is zero benefit to smoking. I get personal freedoms, but you sound like a clown for this argument.

Smoking has zero benefit, and only destroys lives and health and medical services. It’s trash that belongs in the bin.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    At this point who does not know smoking causes cancer? The research is older than my parents.

    It’s a fully optional and expensive vice that adults who know the risks partake in. Most places don’t let smokers smoke indoors anymore to reduce second hand smoke risks. Nobody lets kids buy cigarettes.

    Alcohol is bad for, should it be banned? How about sugar? People might get hurt rock climbing, should that be banned?

    I bring up the slippery slope not as a theory, but because we’re watching it happen in the UK with porn bans, forced identity verification, now criminal prosecution of porn actors, pushes to ban VPNs, and all these vice substances. The UK isn’t at the top of a slope they’re rolling down it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •