Even if the post is true, it was the worst way to present it. It reads like trolling:

Call out people's politics with grandiose rhetoric, not backing up any claims with links to evidence.

Declare the other side is unbiased.

I mean, Internet 101 would dictate you downvote and disengage. It's not going to generate a discussion that would change minds or be constructive. Even now we're not talking about small website discoverability, but instead downvotes.

EDIT: I'm going to put my money where my mouth is. I'll try the same post.