you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 6 months ago (7 children)

It was considered by some, I believe. This author wanted to avoid displacing anyone, though. Of course, many in Germany at that time were guilty in some way, so it would have been justifiable. But it would have always been a cause for tension, which, no matter how justified or morally right it would have been, in practice would lead to tensions similar to those in Israel/Palestine today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    This author wanted to avoid displacing anyone, though.

    Displacing white people. Taking the land of indigeneous people seems totally okay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    As if jews are not indigeneous to that region

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago

    Indigenous identity is tied to historical and biological continuity with a specific territory, rather than religious affiliation alone. Zionists who made the state has no proof of being descendent of the israelites

    Anybody who is jewish with mother and father that are also jewish are given the right to live in the west bank by stealing a palestinian house

  • source
  • parent
  • idk. i would belive most germans would have apprechiated a second chance even under a new flag (allied states or isreal). also i am no scolar in thia at all so feel free to provide soirces to teach me, but wernet the palastinean people promised the lnd thats now isreal to join the wareffort on the side of the allies? thats what i was tought before. so this seems even more explosive than resettleing germany. i mean germans dont even need to move. but accept a new jewisch goverment.

  • source
  • parent