Late Tuesday afternoon, with the subtlety of a wrecking ball and the morality of a foreclosure notice, the Trump administration announced the most devastating attack on the U.S. Forest Service in the agency’s 121-year history. Not a budget cut. Not a policy shift. Not a “reorganization.” An execution.

They’re ripping the headquarters out of Washington and shipping it to Salt Lake City, Utah — the beating heart of the anti-public-lands movement in America. They’re shuttering every single one of the ten regional offices that have governed this agency since Gifford Pinchot built the system over a century ago — and with them, the career professionals who spent entire lifetimes earning the expertise and the authority to push back when politicians came calling with bad ideas and worse motives. They’re destroying more than fifty research facilities across thirty-one states, labs that house decades of irreplaceable long-term science, the kind you literally cannot restart once it’s gone. And they’re replacing all of it — the offices, the scientists, the institutional knowledge, the professional independence — with fifteen political appointees called “state directors,” embedded in state capitals alongside the very governors, legislators, and industry lobbyists who have spent their careers demanding that the Forest Service log more, protect less, and get out of the way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Fuck no. That’s Andrew Yang’s centrist, populist love-child.

It’s going no where, anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    It's tickles the same people that fully embrace the Murc's Law bullshit narrative that has been the common currency for far too long.

    Saying "both sides" should be something that is universally treated like the punchline it is. Just like when Donvict says "two weeks" should be.

    It's contemptible bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    Yeah, you say, "fuck no" like it's awful, but then provide no context as to why it's so repulsive or why he is a bad person...

    As far as a party is concerned, focusing on uniting the middle ground of voters who could use a voice or representation, more consumer privacy, and doing the right thing, yeah, it's so terrible! /s

  • source
  • parent