you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 2 points 7 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

    Nope not anymore, several NATO allies supported Greenland with troops to protect against a US invasion.
    This of course pissed off Trump.
    EU of which many member countries are also NATO members, threatened USA with using the Bazooka, and anti coercion instrument that was originally made to defend against coercion attempts from China.
    This Bazooka if used, could dramatically undermine US economy.
    This warning of course also pissed off Trump.
    I think it's pretty safe to say that Europe and very much Canada too, are tired of pleasing Trump.
    But for some reason Rutte hasn't got the memo, or more likely he didn't understand it.
    And now Trump is pissed off because NATO allies won't let USA use their airbases for the illegal unprovoked war with threats of genocide that Trump entered without a plan, and without notifying NATO allies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    if the US got the boot the Institution would than collapse

    Yes which is why in reality NATO has already collapsed, it's just not been dissolved yet.
    But we can't trust USA to lead NATO anymore. Are you aware that if a NATO operation were to happen in the middle east, USA would have control of the British nukes?
    Obviously we can't allow that.

    as doing so means the US has more assets to bomb Iran and such.

    That is pure fantasy, USA has not redirected anything from the arctic or Greenland to be used against Iran.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    If there is a war that NATO is engaged in as an official NATO engagement then yes. But that is never gonna happen under Trump. Hence NATO is dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    From Google:
    An official NATO engagement, in the context of military operations, refers to actions taken by NATO-led forces authorized by the North Atlantic Council (NAC)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago*

    Oh for fucks sake, google it yourself, why is that in any way relevant?
    Even if it never happened, it remains the purpose of NATO, because it will definitely happen if article 5 is called, and there is an actual country that is the enemy, and the only country to ever call article 5 was USA. But that was based on a terrorist attack, so a bit of a weird situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)