you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 7 months ago (9 children)

From the assumption that nets would only be installed as the result of a lawsuit and that the nets would cost the hospital money it doesn't have, when in fact they probably save the hospital money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    This is just how it works, in my experience. Most safety precautions are installed in response to a disaster, not in anticipation of one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    You're assuming that public hospitals are well enough funded to use discretionary funding in this way. Even the best health systems do not carry a surplus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    It literally saves the hospital money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    It's clearer as time goes on that you have no experience with public sector funding. You're just being contrary for its own sake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments