▲ 361 ▼ This is bad news (europe.pub) submitted 1 year ago by tfm@europe.pub to c/BoycottUnitedStates@europe.pub 29 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/23139783
[–] Deceptichum 7 points 1 year ago (9 children) Did the French not use guns? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) It seems so as well as other weapons. However, they were on more equal footing than the general population is now. Most of the population of america does not have access to the ridiculous armaments or vehicles that the military or other armed forces have, nor the legal authority to use them. Such is the monopoly of violence. If they want this to work they need to be clever, plan well and use violence tactically, have access to technology and knowledge that will aid them, and do good opsec. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Soooo. What's the best way to disable drones from a distance? Anyone know? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Either physically 😏 or with a long radio transmitter/jammer. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent [+] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If every American citizen stocked up, they still wouldn’t beat the American military. It doesn't work like that. That's why the U.S. didn't achieve their goals in Vietnam and the Middle East. You only need small arms to eliminate the higher ranking individuals to collapse the command structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kickforce@europe.pub 1 point 1 year ago Indeed, no need for large scale battles. permalink fedilink source parent [–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) We need a hostile foreign power with nukes to take us out before we hurt anyone else any worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Just start with D.C. That would be enough to solve a lot of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago But how could they pull such a thing off? Those roaches would scatter before anything lands. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) It seems so as well as other weapons. However, they were on more equal footing than the general population is now. Most of the population of america does not have access to the ridiculous armaments or vehicles that the military or other armed forces have, nor the legal authority to use them. Such is the monopoly of violence. If they want this to work they need to be clever, plan well and use violence tactically, have access to technology and knowledge that will aid them, and do good opsec. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Soooo. What's the best way to disable drones from a distance? Anyone know? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Either physically 😏 or with a long radio transmitter/jammer. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Soooo. What's the best way to disable drones from a distance? Anyone know? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Either physically 😏 or with a long radio transmitter/jammer. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Either physically 😏 or with a long radio transmitter/jammer. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent
[+] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If every American citizen stocked up, they still wouldn’t beat the American military. It doesn't work like that. That's why the U.S. didn't achieve their goals in Vietnam and the Middle East. You only need small arms to eliminate the higher ranking individuals to collapse the command structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kickforce@europe.pub 1 point 1 year ago Indeed, no need for large scale battles. permalink fedilink source parent [–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) We need a hostile foreign power with nukes to take us out before we hurt anyone else any worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Just start with D.C. That would be enough to solve a lot of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago But how could they pull such a thing off? Those roaches would scatter before anything lands. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If every American citizen stocked up, they still wouldn’t beat the American military. It doesn't work like that. That's why the U.S. didn't achieve their goals in Vietnam and the Middle East. You only need small arms to eliminate the higher ranking individuals to collapse the command structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kickforce@europe.pub 1 point 1 year ago Indeed, no need for large scale battles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kickforce@europe.pub 1 point 1 year ago Indeed, no need for large scale battles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) We need a hostile foreign power with nukes to take us out before we hurt anyone else any worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Just start with D.C. That would be enough to solve a lot of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago But how could they pull such a thing off? Those roaches would scatter before anything lands. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Just start with D.C. That would be enough to solve a lot of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago But how could they pull such a thing off? Those roaches would scatter before anything lands. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago But how could they pull such a thing off? Those roaches would scatter before anything lands. permalink fedilink source parent