you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

I can agree with that largely but I still contend you’re conflating a few things to make that argument. Fundamentally an LLM will make predictions based on probability (ignoring temperature) and probability does not equal certainty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I would argue that’s empirically true but not fundamentally true. Actually, I’d argue that my point is the fundamental truth here. Computers still cannot generate random output. They simulate the process, and it’s not truly random. It’s just good enough to fool us at the surface level.

  • source
  • parent