While I understand your point, deterministic with a billion variables is beyond human ability to process, let alone the multi-billion parameter models in general circulation today.

Fair enough. There’s a significant difference in complexity between the surface implication of what I said versus reality. Yes, it’s deterministic, but it’s also complex enough that something more should be said… though, we need to be careful here. Our language is not mature enough to scaffold the precise concepts we need here, and attempting to do so regardless carries the risk of smuggling in many concepts we did not intend to smuggle in. Concepts like intent, for example. I agree with you, but cautiously.

At what point does deterministic descend into random?

It shouldn’t at any point. Instead, we’re discussing a system that’s similar to the double pendulum or three body problem. It’s deterministic, though computationally irreducible. That’s chaotic, but it is not random. It’s extremely sensitive to initial conditions.

Been going on for a while. Remember "Alternative Facts"?

I concur.

Lies require intent.

So the AI hallucinates because it loses context. Hooked up to quantum computers you won’t have that happening. So regular people think the thing is stupid while the government has a murder AI.

Ah, it's always hallucinating, sometimes the hallucinations conveniently line up with reality.