▲ -37 ▼ Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted? (www.newyorker.com) submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago (2 children) Why is this so downvoted? permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lutra@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago by writing articles like this they spark the wrong discussion. extreme analogy, sorry to folks who don't do analogies: If there is a robber in a persons kitchen. Any discussion is a net negative for that homeowner. why? because the robbers presence alone is a violation of the sanctity of the home. Any and all solutions, start with the robber not being in the kitchen. Any and all discussion, adds _more time to the robber being in the kitchen All of which is a net loss for the homeowner, and potential gain for the robber. These type's of horserace articles encourage a type of busywork discussions that waste time because they lead many of those readers away from thinking about the real / pertinent discussions to have. permalink fedilink source parent [–] esc@piefed.social 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) Because the question is extremely dumb (regardless of the content of the article). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago by writing articles like this they spark the wrong discussion. extreme analogy, sorry to folks who don't do analogies: If there is a robber in a persons kitchen. Any discussion is a net negative for that homeowner. why? because the robbers presence alone is a violation of the sanctity of the home. Any and all solutions, start with the robber not being in the kitchen. Any and all discussion, adds _more time to the robber being in the kitchen All of which is a net loss for the homeowner, and potential gain for the robber. These type's of horserace articles encourage a type of busywork discussions that waste time because they lead many of those readers away from thinking about the real / pertinent discussions to have. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] esc@piefed.social 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) Because the question is extremely dumb (regardless of the content of the article). permalink fedilink source parent