In the early hours of March 4, 2026, in international waters off the coast of Galle, Sri Lanka, the USS Charlotte, a Los Angeles–class nuclear-powered attack submarine, closed in on the IRIS Dena, a new Iranian Moudge-class frigate.

Submerged, the Charlotte fired a heavyweight, acoustic-homing torpedo at the hull of the Dena. It missed. It fired another. It connected. The periscope footage of the attack was released by the United States Department of War. It shows the shockwave of the torpedo fracturing the Dena’s hull and sending its helicopter flight deck metres into the air.

Within seconds, what was left of the Dena was plummeting to the depths of the Indian Ocean, carrying at least sixty of its crew of 180 to their deaths.

Some moments later, an email was sent from US Indo-Pacific Command to Sri Lanka’s maritime rescue agency. Twenty miles from Galle’s coast, a ship is in distress. Sri Lanka immediately engaged a search and rescue effort that included its air force and navy. The surface of the sea contained clues that a vessel had been attacked and had likely been sunk. But it was not clear whether the attack had come from above or below. They were able to rescue thirty-two sailors, and recover the bodies of eighty-seven others, many of whom had mysteriously broken legs.

The Charlotte had long vanished like an apparition beneath the waves.

This was on the fifth day of the US–Israeli war on Iran, 2,000 nautical miles from the immediate conflict zone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 80 points 7 months ago (22 children)

The US has been the main villain ever since they inherited the role from the British. None of this is surprising if you've been paying attention.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Hey, we were happy dicking around in our own backyard for the first 150 years or so. We even attacked ourselves, we were so bored.

    Then you people asked us to join WW1, and we got a taste of World Domination, and we loved it. So, y'know, you started it.

    We're Frankenstein's Monster, and you let us loose.

    /S, just kidding, America sucks, we know it. A lot of us want to do better, and we're hoping for a different future. We're at a crossroads, things are going to be very different in the future. I just hope it's our difference that prevails, and not MAGAs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago (19 children)

    The 40k universe is clearly inspired by real-world politics. There are only bad guys, villains, and monsters. Nobody has the moral high ground in this mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    "There is no such thing as innocence; only degrees of guilt."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Oh that’s a nice one. Where did you steal that from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    piefed.social/u/QuantumStorm@lemmy.world has it right, i believe - but i'm ashamed to admit that i only know that because i had to look it up after originally hearing it from ... a fanfic, of all things.

    So I have stolen what was already stolen! The writer of said fic was making a direct WH40k reference

    (the fanfic in question is "Shinji and Warhammer 40K" and i cannot possibly describe the appeal of it more adequately than TV Tropes did.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (12 children)

    Centrist, politically relativist nerds unite; incidentally, relativism is a useful cope if you are one of the baddies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    We bombed only seven hospitals, whereas those guys bombed eight. They are clearly the worst, while we are the good guys, relatively speaking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    one side (the americans and their zionist allies) are perpetrating obvious genocide and threatening atrocities to the rest of the world, while the people in Iran are defending themselves; Man why is morality so difficult!?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Morality DLC was too expensive... Well, actually cheaper than the Ethnic Cleansing DLC, Dictatorship DLC or Warmongering DLC etc. So many to choose from, so obviously American got all of them, but ran out of money just before clicking buy on the Morality DLC. Oh well…

    Anyway, Imperialism DLC just got updated, so maybe it’s about time to finally try that out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    They already tried the imperialism expansion; it ended up in a lot of dead nazis. I am eager to see the imperialist and nazis screaming and burning once again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (7 children)

    Ah yes, if only we’d let moral absolutists like you take the wheel, we’d finally have a world where every conflict is solved by pointing at the other side and yelling "No, you’re the baddie!"

    Heaven forbid anyone try to classify things at a level above a kindergarten playground.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    If anything, you're the one closer to being a moral absolutist. Iran does some bad things, but they're also at war with genocidal nazi pedophiles who want to destroy their country. You equivocate the two so that you don't have to feel uncomfortable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Nowhere in that comment was I equivocating the two. It's not like the only two options are "USA bad, Iran good" or "USA bad, Iran bad". That's just a false dichotomy and more of the kind of black and white thinking I was criticizing. I also don't have to find ways to not feel uncomfortable about it simply because I am not an American.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    thank you for making a perfect example of what a nazi would say! Can you say that again while goose stepping doing the roman salute and threatening the destruction of a whole civilization? Your type of people will be remembered as the ghouls that were doing defense for the mass murderers that are set to wreck the earth and that stain will never come off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (2 children)

    Yes, Nazis famously made nuanced moral judgements and never sought to demonize or thought certain groups were unequivocally bad at all. LMFAO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    They also killed a lot of innocent civilians and they were experts at handwaving those murders.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    I don't know about that. I think they were pretty unapologetic about and certainly provided (bad but clear) ideological reasons for all the murdering they did, even making them official government projects. Don't remember reading much about handwaving except in the context of certain types of salutes.

  • source
  • parent