Kinda curious about this; what's the deal with folks cutting off the artist's name and site?

I read the "ads" argument in the comments, but I don't buy it as attribution isn't an advert. So what's it actually all about?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 45 points 7 months ago (5 children)

There's one singular vocal guy around that doesn't like that authors sign their work and thinks that's blatant and dishonest self-promotion.

That's all.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Even better, they think a signature is self promotion but that users should instead provide links to the creator's page because that isn't self promotion while not including a link themselves after cropping off the signatures.

    The user's logic makes no sense and they don't even follow it!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago

    What's especially crazy is he does this to artists who make web comics, but when he posts news articles he posts a link to the article and sometimes an excerpt, and some of those include the names of the authors. So the only "ads" that count are the signatures/watermarks/socials on web comics.

  • source
  • parent