you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 106 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (17 children)

Women fought for the right to not be dependent on men.

A woman that depends on a man's income to survive is stuck even in DV cases.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 7 months ago* (6 children)

    We're the women of the union and we sure know how to fight.
    We'll fight for women's issues and we'll fight for women's rights.
    A woman's work is never done from morning until night.
    Women make the union strong!
    (Chorus)

    It is we who wash the dishes, scrub the floors and clean the dirt,
    Feed the kids and send them off to school—and then we go to work,
    Where we work for half men's wages for a boss who likes to flirt.
    But the union makes us strong!
    (Chorus)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Where we work for half men’s wages for a boss who likes to flirt.

    damn that hits hard

    also the song is smooth af

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    any song set to John Brown's Body is a great song

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    it's a folk song written about the 1850s/60s abolitionist/terrorist who was put to death for treason in 1860 for attempting to inspire a mass national slave uprising in Harper's Ferry, VA (today WV).

    Fun fact, the guy who lives in his house is super cool! (i used to live down the street from his headquarters in West Virginia)

    sample: https://micahkesselring.bandcamp.com/track/john-browns-body

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    TIL that the Battle Hymn of the Republic was an abolitionist song and based on another abolitionist song:

    The "Battle Hymn of the Republic" is an American patriotic song written by the abolitionist writer Julia Ward Howe during the American Civil War.

    Howe adapted her song from the soldiers' song "John Brown's Body" in November 1861, and sold it for $4 to The Atlantic Monthly[1] in February 1862. In contrast to the lyrics of the soldiers' song, her version links the Union cause with God's vengeance at the Day of Judgment (through allusions to biblical passages such as Isaiah 63:1–6, Revelation 19 and Revelation 14:14–19).

    Julia Ward Howe was married to Samuel Gridley Howe, a scholar in education of the blind. Both Samuel and Julia were also active leaders in anti-slavery politics and strong supporters of the Union. Samuel was a member of the Secret Six, the group who funded John Brown's work.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_Hymn_of_the_Republic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Now women are dependent on an employer instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    That just means the struggle isn't over, not that the struggle was pointless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    how does fighting for the right to work reduce the dependency on an employer?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It doesn't. It means that fighting to reduce our dependency on employers is part of the next step.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    who to be dependent on instead? or do you want to grow your own corn in your back yard?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Reducing dependency on employers doesn't mean completely doing away with employment. Probably the most effective way would be establishing stronger worker protections so employers can't exploit their employees so profoundly. If employee protections can be designed well enough, and enforced strongly enough that exploitation can be reduced to 0, fully rendering the means of production and their benefits to the worker.

    Essentially, we can't dismantle patriarchy without dismantling the economic structures that prop it up. Turns out liberation movements like feminism and worker freedom dovetail with each other pretty well. After all, no one is free until everyone is free.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    You can't see the difference between being forced to work and have sex with a single man, who you are stuck with without the possibility of divorce, and the general need to work for one of any number of employers? Really?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment