you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -68 points 7 months ago (36 children)
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    What "usefulness" do you get out of them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 7 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Are you not familiar with "ctrl+f"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 7 months ago* (6 children)
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

    Better question is, when did you lose basic keyword-based searching skills? I know you may want your answers on a platter but realize that there's value in manual searches. Searching for something with LLMs on the page that you're on is questionable on so many levels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    It's not harder, though, it's actually quite instant if you know what you're doing. A lot of documentation is literally one single web page, and the majority that is not can be navigated with the regular search and ctrl+F just fine.

    There's no substitute to taking 40 minutes to get acquainted with the documentation to know what you need rather than trial & error your way through a problem blindly.

    you could get an LLM to return you the correct page in some documentation

    It's unreliable and prone to errors, and I say that after using LLM-based searches for months at work. Too many times it confuses areas, makes stuff up, or cites some irrelevant page just to give any answer at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    How can I possibly be doing it wrong when the page it's citing mentions nothing of what it's taking about, or when it tells me to do something that we as a company do not do?

    I’ve been doing this shit for 20 years now.

    Welcome to the club.

    it’s an extremely useful tool

    Sure, for writing letters but not for searching which is what I'm taking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I don’t rely on the LLM to give me the answer.

    So why are you assuming that I do, again? Aren't I the one telling you that I do manual searches precisely because the search function is so hit or miss?

    it’s not good for creative works.

    What creative work? This is basic communication that we carefully outline first and then feed it to the LLM to spit out the same thing in formal language. Lol

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    You do not have access to a secret LLM that doesn’t introduce errors. You either don’t notice them or dismiss them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 55 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    If they’re so useful, why are they being forced on everyone, including by making them part of performance reviews?

    If they’re useful people will naturally use them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -64 points 7 months ago (6 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    How about allowing AI to be rolled out and adopted organically instead of trying to gavage it down everyone's throats?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    I'd that tool didn't come at the destructive costs involved, AI would be a lot more palatable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -27 points 7 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    If that's what it takes to stop the excessive destruction caused by unregulated data center construction and operation, yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Do you need to reread my comment instead of reacting to a single word of it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I answered you. But you still seem confused. What don't you understand about my reply?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago

    You're screaming into the echo chamber, mate. Unless you're so rabidly anti-AI you believe and spread one of a few comforting, imaginary narratives, you'll be dog piled.

    I'm staunchly critical of AI, but won't pretend that it only consists of generative AI, that it still operates as poorly as it did years ago, nor that a disturbing percentage of the population either doesn't care about or actually supports that shit, so I get my share of insults. Being pro-AI won't get you much civility so set your expectations low. Unless you're trolling. Then you've nailed it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)