just_another_person comments on New Linux Security Flaw Uses Initramfs to Inject Malware

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How are you going to boot something that's encrypted without input to unlock it?

parent

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

You always "boot something that is unencrypted." You then "mount" the encrypted volumes and load the OS.

This is how people can put an SSH server (dropbear) in initramfs so they can unlock remotely.

The attack is to initramfs, not the encrypted layer.

The order'ish:

parent

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

I'm well aware. You're proving my point at mount.

parent

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago

But.. your original comment is just.. wrong?

This isn't a critical security flaw unless you have the worst partition scheme on your encrypted volumes imaginable.

The default LUKS partition scheme is vulnerable.

It's not even a process flaw at that point, just "possible".

There is a successful POC, it is a flaw.

you can compromise disks once encrypted because everything is happening in an in-memory boot process.

This is not just in-memory. This is modifying the unencrypted part of initramfs on disk. Powering off the machine does not remove the exploit.

parent