▲ 51 ▼ Deafness reversed: One injection restores hearing in just weeks – ScienceDaily (www.sciencedaily.com) submitted 7 months ago by rssbot@lemmy.bestiver.se [B] to c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se 8 comments fedilink hide all child comments Comments
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 7 months ago (6 children) In 10 patients with a specific form of deafness* permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] graycube@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (2 children) It is still pretty amazing and life changing for the recipients. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 months ago (1 child) No doubt, just wanted to put that sensationalized headline into context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 2 points 7 months ago They did qualify it with the adjective "small" and quantified it by stating there were 10 patients. I mean, it doesn't look to me like they are trying to make grand claims unsupported by their work. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) About 200,000 people worldwide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago Yes, absolutely. This has some major implications for thousands. I should have been more clear that I’m not saying this is bunk, just that it is in a small number, limited to a specific kind of deafness, and side effects haven’t been fully studied. I’m in no way trying to discredit what was achieved, I just hate this level of clickbait title. permalink fedilink source parent [–] logi@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago In 10 patients In 10 out of 10 people tested, so that's pretty good. with a specific form of deafness* Yeah, one specific genetic defect. They're looking into others now so hopefully this is just the start. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] graycube@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (2 children) It is still pretty amazing and life changing for the recipients. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 months ago (1 child) No doubt, just wanted to put that sensationalized headline into context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 2 points 7 months ago They did qualify it with the adjective "small" and quantified it by stating there were 10 patients. I mean, it doesn't look to me like they are trying to make grand claims unsupported by their work. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 months ago (1 child) No doubt, just wanted to put that sensationalized headline into context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 2 points 7 months ago They did qualify it with the adjective "small" and quantified it by stating there were 10 patients. I mean, it doesn't look to me like they are trying to make grand claims unsupported by their work. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 2 points 7 months ago They did qualify it with the adjective "small" and quantified it by stating there were 10 patients. I mean, it doesn't look to me like they are trying to make grand claims unsupported by their work. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) About 200,000 people worldwide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago Yes, absolutely. This has some major implications for thousands. I should have been more clear that I’m not saying this is bunk, just that it is in a small number, limited to a specific kind of deafness, and side effects haven’t been fully studied. I’m in no way trying to discredit what was achieved, I just hate this level of clickbait title. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago Yes, absolutely. This has some major implications for thousands. I should have been more clear that I’m not saying this is bunk, just that it is in a small number, limited to a specific kind of deafness, and side effects haven’t been fully studied. I’m in no way trying to discredit what was achieved, I just hate this level of clickbait title. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] logi@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago In 10 patients In 10 out of 10 people tested, so that's pretty good. with a specific form of deafness* Yeah, one specific genetic defect. They're looking into others now so hopefully this is just the start. permalink fedilink source parent