you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

The point is to

  1. gain more exploitation-leverage for the big-tech owners of our civilization, while
  2. making Linux illegal, because it isn't locked-proprietary-enforcing-this-regime.

Elegant as can be.

Removal of competition while breaking the population from civilrights, too.


there needs to be an age-verification-ONLY ID, which makes it illegal for age-verifying companies to ask passport-images, or driver's-license images, etc, so as to break the identity-theft-chain that big-tech's working at creating, as fast as it can.

The whole thing about making operating systems be the "owners" of the authority, is to make all non-Microsoft/Apple/Google OS's illegal.

Period.

ID should always be orthogonal.

Healthcard ought never be used for anything else.

There ought be a specific ID card for one's province/canton/prefecture/state, which provides only the minimum-required information.

Years ago, I discovered that anybody could run a name on the local drivers'-license ID database, & it would provide a picture of said person, which is WRONG.

Secure by design, not when "lucky".

Every ID ought be purpose-only, locked-down, & illegal to abuse.

( I also hold that it ought be illegal for the "credit rating" companies to protect disinformation, while disallowing the life in-question from fixing it with true information,

AND that legal-address ought be a right, such that even homeless people can have a mailing-address, so as to not be locked-out from the ability to get ID, or to have a cellphone, etc )

Solving the wrong problem, for machiavellian purposes, is all that this is.

_ /\ _

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Respectfully, I find the way you finish every comment with the praying hands thing irritating.

    Make of that what you will. Perhaps I'm just an irritable grump.

  • source
  • parent