you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 7 months ago (7 children)

True, but I was referring to copses of trees, creeks, hillsides, slabs of boulder, underground water. Things that are a pain in the ass to farm around so often affect the division of property lines and then the selling rates of land.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    That happens in parts of the US that actually have those things, just not in the super flat bits that don’t have anything interesting in them to use as a boundary to begin with. Kinda hard to break things up by rivers or ridges or trees when there aren’t any there naturally. But near me, that stuff is super common as boundaries for fields for exactly the same reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Does the area you live in not get deforested? We generally pull boulders and whatnot out of the ground when we have to in order to make more sellable plots

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    Not really, no, though there are logging operations and they sometimes ruin large swaths of land by planting shit like a whole forest of pine where there used to be a healthy mixed forest.

    This area is pretty heavily wooded yet, though. The fields that are here are old, generations back stuff with more natural boundaries, rows of wind-break trees between fields and the like, swampy areas left in field corners. We aren’t really adding new farmland here either, in fact there are incentive programs to reforest former farmland. Often old farmland is used for development.

    We do pull stuff out if we are developing the property, sure, but otherwise no, most land is left pretty natural.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment