So that'll include some farmworkers rights right? Right?

Nah, it'll be straight slavery.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 130 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Hmm, tell you what: maybe the migrants could live in shacks near the farm, so they wouldn't have the difficulties of finding a place to stay without papers. And the farmer could provide basic foodstuff for them. The migrants would save on commuting and groceries.

And then to solve their undocumentated status, maybe the farmers could own the migrants: if they're somebody's, then they have a legal status, right?

And then we could rename the farms plantations.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    When the laws apply to people and not property, we can just start owning people as if they are property. It's really quite simple, you just need to be evil to make it work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 12 points 1 year ago

    Whenever Repuglicants suggest anything, just speculate to the worst case scenario and there you'll find their ultimate goal.

    Their voters just have no fucking sense of how bad their leaders will make things ever!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Whoa now, careful there. With the cutting of renewable energy the next thing you know companies will be offering boons like onsite housing and increased pay in the form of something like Company Tokens that can be used for good the company kindly ships in.

  • source
  • parent