▲ 353 ▼ Study finds smartphone bans in Dutch schools improved focus (www.reuters.com) submitted 1 year ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago (3 children) Yeah, except science does not work like that. 😐 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yes, it does. A subjective response can absolutely be an objective result. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) This is not a demonstration and this does not qualify as a scientific proof. 🤷 They polled teachers. It ir like I polled religious and conclude that God exists because God speaks to most of the people I polled. This is not science, sorry not sorry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Good example! That poll would be a relevant result for a percent of the population the believes in god. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yes, it does. A subjective response can absolutely be an objective result. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) This is not a demonstration and this does not qualify as a scientific proof. 🤷 They polled teachers. It ir like I polled religious and conclude that God exists because God speaks to most of the people I polled. This is not science, sorry not sorry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Good example! That poll would be a relevant result for a percent of the population the believes in god. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) This is not a demonstration and this does not qualify as a scientific proof. 🤷 They polled teachers. It ir like I polled religious and conclude that God exists because God speaks to most of the people I polled. This is not science, sorry not sorry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Good example! That poll would be a relevant result for a percent of the population the believes in god. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Good example! That poll would be a relevant result for a percent of the population the believes in god. permalink fedilink source parent