Banks, governments and technology providers need to be prepared for quantum computer hackers capable of breaking most existing encryption systems by 2029, Google has warned.

The tech company said in a blogpost that quantum computers would pose a “significant threat to current cryptographic standards” before the end of the decade and urged other companies to follow its lead.

The company, owned by Alphabet, said: “The encryption currently used to keep your information confidential and secure could easily be broken by a large-scale quantum computer in coming years.”

As it stands, quantum computers – which can rapidly carry out complex tasks – are a nascent technology with great potential and significant obstacles to being widely usable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 7 months ago (3 children)

https://signal.org/blog/spqr/

Tell us something we didn’t know google, turns out there’s people out there that already devising solutions for this problem but your already know that

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I mean, they specifically point to post-quantum cryptography and advise people to move towards it in the article:

    Google said: “We’ve adjusted our threat model to prioritise post-quantum cryptography migration for authentication services – an important component of online security and digital signature migrations. We recommend that other engineering teams follow suit.”

    The issue here is not that there aren't solutions; it's that organizations are not interested in taking the time and effort to move towards them. I've been beating this particular drum at my org for about a year, and I've gotten zero traction. This is a concern because moving to New encryption means taking all the data you've got, decrypting it, and re-encrypting it. That's not fast when you're talking hundreds of terabytes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Fairly not super experienced on things. but how viable is a layered system, does it just prohibitively slow or storage consuming or is it moderately feasible to say double encapsulate everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment