70
Vehicles belonging to Jewish ambulance service set on fire in London in apparent antisemitic attack (apnews.com)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/world
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

An exerpt from "the big book of rules of how to be a decent human being" for you

"Rule 1. Dont be a cunt.

The end."

This concludes the big book of rules of how to be a decent human being.

And yes, despitethe actions of the settler state, and the actions of britain that led to ths creation of said genocidal state, there are still laws in the UK to protect EVERYONE, even if they fall for propaganda and support hateful things.

Someone far smarter than I am said

"If you don't support human rights for everyone, you don't support human rights at all."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    I dont think we disagree on the general direction of what justice would be. Im pessimistic it can happen there.

    Im really fucking sick of clarifying this. I know the full responsibility of my frustration does not fall on you and it may not be fair to demand an answer to the following question but i do hope i can still ask without offending:

    Why the fuck is the default assumption that my expectations and hopes are the same, with no gulf between them? What the actual fuck is fucking wrong with so fucking many people, including yourself?

    Are you all children? Do you assume im a child? If you assume im a child, is this some sort of default or do i raise some sort of flag?

    If you are not a child or assuming im a child then how on earth do you expect depth or nuance when every statement must conform to your immediate visceral emotional response and assume is=aught?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    You asked "Must they" as if there was a situation whete they shouldn't be punished to the full extent of the law (at the very least that's my interpretation of your question) and then called the uk a terf country that doesn't have any laws.

    Hence my joke about the big book of rules

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Must not should. Jesus's syphilitic cock i hate what weve made of our species.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    Nobody said "should"?

    Genuinely don't get where the distinction is, like "they must get punished" and "they should get punished" say the same thing

    Unless you're thinking along the lines of "they will" vs "they should", in which case I get where you're coming from

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent