▲ 1085 ▼ Supply and demand (slrpnk.net) submitted 7 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/memes@slrpnk.net 209 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (5 children) Nothing matters if the planet is nearly uninhabitable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago (4 children) I'm not sure what your point is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (3 children) Im saying its insane to worry about the economy when we are facing down making parts of the earth uninhabitable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago* (2 children) I see, but I'm saying that nobody is worrying about the economy here except as a means to make sure more solar power is deployed, in service of not making parts of the earth uninhabitable, and I don't see how there could be an objection to that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 0 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Because we aren't deploying it enough, because we are entertaining a return to coal or and fighting wars over oil still. When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago we aren’t deploying it enough When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. I am pretty sure the article is in full agreement with you on these things and I think you are misunderstanding what it says. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago (4 children) I'm not sure what your point is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (3 children) Im saying its insane to worry about the economy when we are facing down making parts of the earth uninhabitable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago* (2 children) I see, but I'm saying that nobody is worrying about the economy here except as a means to make sure more solar power is deployed, in service of not making parts of the earth uninhabitable, and I don't see how there could be an objection to that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 0 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Because we aren't deploying it enough, because we are entertaining a return to coal or and fighting wars over oil still. When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago we aren’t deploying it enough When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. I am pretty sure the article is in full agreement with you on these things and I think you are misunderstanding what it says. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (3 children) Im saying its insane to worry about the economy when we are facing down making parts of the earth uninhabitable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago* (2 children) I see, but I'm saying that nobody is worrying about the economy here except as a means to make sure more solar power is deployed, in service of not making parts of the earth uninhabitable, and I don't see how there could be an objection to that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 0 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Because we aren't deploying it enough, because we are entertaining a return to coal or and fighting wars over oil still. When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago we aren’t deploying it enough When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. I am pretty sure the article is in full agreement with you on these things and I think you are misunderstanding what it says. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago* (2 children) I see, but I'm saying that nobody is worrying about the economy here except as a means to make sure more solar power is deployed, in service of not making parts of the earth uninhabitable, and I don't see how there could be an objection to that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 0 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Because we aren't deploying it enough, because we are entertaining a return to coal or and fighting wars over oil still. When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago we aren’t deploying it enough When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. I am pretty sure the article is in full agreement with you on these things and I think you are misunderstanding what it says. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 0 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Because we aren't deploying it enough, because we are entertaining a return to coal or and fighting wars over oil still. When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago we aren’t deploying it enough When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. I am pretty sure the article is in full agreement with you on these things and I think you are misunderstanding what it says. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago we aren’t deploying it enough When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. I am pretty sure the article is in full agreement with you on these things and I think you are misunderstanding what it says. permalink fedilink source parent