382
Bring Back the Burned CD— They’re a love language. And a reminder of the hope we once had. (thetyee.ca)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
119 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Vinyl made sense because of its high fidelity. Cassettes do not make sense unless you enjoy dogshit audio quality

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Incorrect. I have three NAD 6300s and a Nakamichi Dragon, and with metal tapes it’s transparent to digital. Shit even good type II nearly transparent. Tapes do not sound “dogshit”. Unlike vinyl, you can easily experiment with the many varieties of tape out there and master your own cassette recordings. It’s like rolling tubes in an analog amplifier. Yes, it’s not perfectly transparent to digital on a cheap type I tape, but the warmth of a high end type I rounds off some of the harshness of modern tracks. YMMV, it’s not for everyone, but I think it’s pretty fucking cool.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    This is a rare setup. Kind of vintage audio unicorn.

    You still have a noticeable noise floor and medium limitations as equalizer, though ("warmer").

    99.999% of decks and surviving tapes do sound like dogshit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Nah, this is wrong. Cassettes don’t sound like dogshit and most vintage decks sound great when properly calibrated.

    Modern $20 Chinese portables sound like ass, I’ll give you that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    OK, well, you have a lot more tolerance for tape hiss and compression artifacts and muted highs than I do, the only quiet tapes I’ve heard were big fat studio tapes when I had access to a research studio.

    I spent so many years trying to get a decent field recording out of the best portable recording (cassette) decks that I may be a little traumatized. DAT recording was a revelation, even with horribly unreliable decks.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I mean reel tape kills vinyl and cassette. It surpasses or equals digital in high $$ situations.

    *its mostly about the mastering

    Yes, its clunky huge and expensive and has a limited catalog. But once you've heard one you'll want more.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, no doubt. Reel to reel is the ultimate analog media.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I love showing it to people who havent heard great audio.

    But yeah, its so expensive. The best part tho is unlike records, tapes are very robust if you keep them in normal temperatures and away from magnets. No surface noise, and most tapes the hiss is hardly noticeable especially on anything 15 IPS.

    The good part about the limited catalog is you're going to always get super high quality from it because its so limited and expensive to do

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent