Uh huh...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Well, then I'm either thinking of an older DLSS, or something else entirely.

BBC ran an article with a bit more to it, showing the same Resident Evil image with/without DLSS 5, and it looked more different than I expected it to. So nah, I'm not gonna defend this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago*

    Yeah. Previous generations of DLSS were about achieving the same result with less.

    DLSS 5 is about "improving" what was previously the end result, even in cases where DLSS wouldn't have been needed in the first place.

    Nvidia is claiming it achieves "hollywood movie cgi" fidelity.

    In practice it looks like the result is just not pleasant.

  • source
  • parent