98
Manjaro 2.0 Manifesto (forum.manjaro.org)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Why should that be a flaw on Arch's side, when it ooses no issue on Arch's side? Partial updates are explicitly not supported. That would be fine for Manjaro if they would not encourage the use or for some cases even enable the use of AUR by default.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    Partial updates are explicitly not supported.

    This is what I'm referring to. Pacman is the only package manager I've used with this limitation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Yes but that is on Manjaro if they do not follow basic rules from their upstream and not on arch. If you ignore design desicions then thats on you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    True, but also why is that a rule from upstream?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Thats the only (sane without tons of work) way how you can have a rolling release distro without the need to compile everything yourself, everytime. Dependency issues will occure when glibc gets updated (or any other library) and you only update some programms but not all, its possible that those programms work or not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •