Case was seen as major test of the first amendment and whether the US could use broad anti-terrorism statute to prosecute leftwing protesters

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

There shouldn't be a law against terrorism. Real terrorism already involves serious crimes (murder etc.). There should not be a law defining "being a terrorist" as illegal.

"found guilty of support for terrorism" is bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments