153
Trump says he won’t sign any bills into law until SAVE America Act passes (thehill.com)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

President Trump on Sunday threatened to not sign any bills into law until the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act is approved by the Senate, doubling down on his push to change voting requirements ahead of the midterm elections.

“I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed, AND NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION – GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY – ILLNESS, DISABILITY…,” the president wrote in his Sunday morning Truth Social post.

If the president doesn't sign a bill, it becomes law in 10 days. Sundays don't count, and if congress adjourns during the period, it counts as a veto.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 53 points 8 months ago (14 children)

The SAVE Act passing is probably a good sign to leave the US.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 34 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    no, you go out swinging... failure to stop it will allow for it to expand and you won't be able to keep running. it will come for you

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    My great grandparents came to this country in the early 20th century fleeing fascism in Europe. It was their decision to leave that kept them and their family alive. Their friends that stayed weren't as lucky.

    I've always wondered what caused them to make up their minds. What was the final straw that snapped that made them say "We need to leave for our safety, there's no hope of stopping what will come."

    Ever since they announced this bill, I think I found my equivalent. If this thing passes, there's no saving the country. The DNC simply won't act to mitigate its damage, I've seen how they work. The only outcome after that isn't total fascist rule is violent and bloody civil war. And, frankly, I don't trust Americans to fix the country however that war would shake out.

    I think I'd just rather try my luck elsewhere.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago* (6 children)

    FWIW America managed to cobble together an America that lasted 161 years after the first civil war.

    That’s not that bad honestly, so, it could be done again…

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    161 years is NOTHING for a country. Almost all other major nations are a millenium or older.

    The city I lived in before this one was founded in 1776 and the one I live in now is about a thousand years older. We have buildings still standing that are 5 times as old as the US or older.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    True, but how stable has the actual government been through that time? Cities almost universally live through many governments throughout their existence.

    This goes for nations, one clue here is they used to be called kingdoms with a very different form of government from many nations today.

    Also if you do some research on this you find that the United States has one of the longest running constitutional democracies in the world.

    So while 161 years might not seem like much in the arc of history, as far as democracy goes it’s nothing to sneeze at.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago*

    Also if you do some research on this you find that the United States has one of the longest running constitutional democracies in the world.

    The US constitution is the second oldest active constitution in the world.

    The oldest is the constitution for the US state of Massachusetts.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It's not worth fighting for. It always has and still is a land of thieving, lying bastards. You can die for it if you want. I'd rather just go.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago*

    You're missing one major difference here though. America was the exception to most every part of the world during WW2. It was the only major power that was not victim to massive bombing campaigns or direct on the ground warfare.

    There is no such place to flee to today. China, maybe, for the time being.

    Fleeing was the best choice for your grandparents. But that doesn't mean it is for you or I. Your grandparents didn't have the "perfect" line that they decided to leave at. They didn't even make a perfect calculated choice on where to flee to. Your grandparents, to put it bluntly, were lucky. And, well, if your grandparents were fleeing Japan instead of Europe they would have been met with significantly different treatment when coming to America at that time and have likely died in a camp.

    You're looking at their decisions with hindsight and trying to project them onto a world that is entering an entirely different world war.

    I wish you the best. And I can't say any decision is better than another. But, I don't think you can either. We all have to hope we are as lucky are your grandparents were.

    And at the end of the day. None of will be "lucky" if no one stands up to fight back.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (1 reply)