According to the release:

Adds experimental PostgreSQL support

The code was written by Cursor and Claude

14,997 added lines of code, and 10,202 lines removed

reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks

This makes me uneasy, especially as ntfy is an internet facing service. I am now looking for alternatives.

Am I overreacting or do you all share the same concern?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Agreed. I have a sense that, eventually, development communities will figure out etiquette and policies to govern LLM usage. But how do you enforce that kind of policy? Right now, it's essentially a judgement call by the maintainers. It's hard to catch sneaky LLM usage.

On the other hand, I think there are objectively good ways to use LLMs for software:

  • High-level design and planning
  • Technical Research (although this tends towards the most popular tech)
  • POCs & rapid prototyping
  • "Textbook" solutions
  • TDD Red/Green development (where the LLM generates failing tests based on the high-level spec, and the programmer writes the implementation)
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Indeed also read the paper called Programming as Theory building. From 1985. Which is very relevant today again. Since people lose the connection with the code due to Ai.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    One of my favorite papers! On a similar note, I recently started reading A Philosophy of Software Design by John Ousterhout. Although it's a lot more recent (2018), I'd argue it's required reading in light of the LLM hype craze.

  • source
  • parent