▲ 515 ▼ stolen (quokk.au) submitted 8 months ago by Deceptichum to c/mop 33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago (4 children) Who ever was there before them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Deceptichum [S] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children) No one was there before they arrived there 700 years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Ok. Finding an outlier as an example isn't impressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago I mean... if the claim is "all", it's not really an outlier. It's refuting the claim. An outlier is statistical; claiming "all" is either true or false. Not really interchangeable, without changing context permalink fedilink source parent [–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago But providing the existence of a counter example is the foundational detraction to all-encompassing claims like "all land is stolen", in logic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deceptichum [S] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children) No one was there before they arrived there 700 years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Ok. Finding an outlier as an example isn't impressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago I mean... if the claim is "all", it's not really an outlier. It's refuting the claim. An outlier is statistical; claiming "all" is either true or false. Not really interchangeable, without changing context permalink fedilink source parent [–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago But providing the existence of a counter example is the foundational detraction to all-encompassing claims like "all land is stolen", in logic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Ok. Finding an outlier as an example isn't impressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago I mean... if the claim is "all", it's not really an outlier. It's refuting the claim. An outlier is statistical; claiming "all" is either true or false. Not really interchangeable, without changing context permalink fedilink source parent [–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago But providing the existence of a counter example is the foundational detraction to all-encompassing claims like "all land is stolen", in logic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago I mean... if the claim is "all", it's not really an outlier. It's refuting the claim. An outlier is statistical; claiming "all" is either true or false. Not really interchangeable, without changing context permalink fedilink source parent
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago But providing the existence of a counter example is the foundational detraction to all-encompassing claims like "all land is stolen", in logic. permalink fedilink source parent
