US military investigators have said it is likely its forces were responsible for a strike on a girls’ school in Iran that killed scores of children and has been condemned as a war crime, according to a report by Reuters.​

The attack on the Minab girls’ school in southern Iran on Saturday is believed to have killed at least 165 people, mostly children under the age of 12.

​The UN’s education agency, Unesco, said the attack was a “grave violation of humanitarian law”.

​US war secretary Pete Hegseth said on Wednesday that the military was investigating the incident. Investigators have not reached a final conclusion and it is still unclear what evidence contributed to their assessment, Reuters reported, citing two unnamed officials.

It was also unclear what type of munitions were used and who was responsible, the outlet said.

An investigation by news outlet Middle East Eye determined that the attack on the school was a “double tap” strike – where a target is hit a second time in order to kill rescuers who come to the aid of the injured.

“When the first bomb hit the school, one of the teachers and the principal moved a group of students to the prayer hall to protect them,” a Red Crescent medic told the outlet, citing conversations he had with survivors.

“The principal called the parents and told them to come and pick up their children. But the second bomb hit that area as well. Only a small number of those who had taken shelter survived.”

​The UK has joined the war on Iran – which is illegal because it was not approved by the UN or US congress – by allowing the use of its bases for strikes against the country.

Prime minister Keir Starmer has claimed the UK’s involvement is an act of self-defence, despite the fact the US and Israel started the war.


From Novara Media via This RSS Feed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 42 points 8 months ago (19 children)

Absolutely monstrous to double tap a school. That doesn't happen by accident, as so many things do in war. Disgusting.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Even if the school had been a legitimate target in a legal war, double-tapping any site like that is a war crime. The second strike is specifically targeting people providing aid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Kind of like a second strike on a boat meant to kill anyone who survived the first strike?

    It's too bad that the US government doesn't recognize the ICC. I doubt anyone in the Trump administration will ever be held accountable for their war crimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    How much you bet they let their AI choose targets and AI simply went for maximum efficiency.

    That moment when you realize you forgot to uncomment a line.

    #import law.international #TODO: uncomment before release
    

    Oops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    you're absolute right! I shouldn't have targeted a school. I am sorry. Next time I will do better. Thank you for telling me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Remember, I am a large language model and I am not qualified to give military advice. In any actual conflict you should always speak to your team of military advisors and strategists

    With that in mind, are there any other locations I can help you target today?

    Or, if you'd like, I can help draft an international press release denying accountability and blaming a software malfunction for our double-tap mistake?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Accident and deliberate aren’t the only two options. I think the most likely cause is gross negligence on the part of intelligence (who may have been relying on outdated information).

    Gross negligence carries culpability. It’s still a war crime because the responsibility for due diligence is on the attackers.

    To show that it was deliberate is another matter entirely. There’d have to be evidence that they knew it was a school full of children and that they ordered the attack anyway. Why would they do that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (7 children)

    I mean we don't know for sure (afaik) it was intentionally the school, just that they were involved.

    Double taps are always planned though.

    Edit: Could have been bad intel that didnt indicate it was a school for example

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Seems hard to miss... I'm sure they have maps somewhere. Or Google Maps. They were not raiding a town being occupied by military forces that may have been occupying a school, they were bombing the capital of a country in peace time.

    google maps of schools in Tehran

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments