▲ 179 ▼ AI promised to free up workers’ time. UC Berkeley researchers found the opposite. (newsroom.haas.berkeley.edu) submitted 8 months ago by Valnao@sh.itjust.works to c/science@lemmy.world 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 8 months ago (8 children) Tbh note taking is something LLMs are good at permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 15 points 8 months ago* (7 children) Transcriptions, mostly decent. Notes and summaries? Not if you care about accuracy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cravl@slrpnk.net 7 points 8 months ago (3 children) And transcriptions usually aren't really even AI; speech-to-text has been around a while. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children) Speech to text is AI and always has been. It wasn't always the current LLM slop bots that coopted the name, sure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cravl@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago You're 100% right, and I should know that too. “Not LLM-based” is indeed what I was intending to say. It gets hard to remember the (correct) broader definition when slop is being shoved into your brain through every possible orifice. Even for us that vehemently disagree, it still subconsciously molds the frameworks and language we use. It's insidious, really. See this article by a fellow lemming which I highly recommend. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 8 months ago (2 children) Transcriptions, mostly decent. Yup, quite good Notes and summaries? It works mostly to shrink the meaning. Something that LLMs are trained for in the first place. And that's all. 2 separate steps that are both good and reliable to an extent. One of the best applications of ai so far permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 child) There was someone at work who was using read.ai for technical discussion and the few summaries I read were like someone who didn't understand the topic and couldn't tell what details were important. We would summarize the decisions and next steps and each one had at least one really important thing changed or left out. A transcription getting words wrong but still phonetically right is still more helpful than a misleading summary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 point 8 months ago Not if you care about accuracy. Now I understand the last part. Agreed, something deeply specialized could be in danger here. I had corpo speak in mind writing the previous messages permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 15 points 8 months ago* (7 children) Transcriptions, mostly decent. Notes and summaries? Not if you care about accuracy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cravl@slrpnk.net 7 points 8 months ago (3 children) And transcriptions usually aren't really even AI; speech-to-text has been around a while. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children) Speech to text is AI and always has been. It wasn't always the current LLM slop bots that coopted the name, sure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cravl@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago You're 100% right, and I should know that too. “Not LLM-based” is indeed what I was intending to say. It gets hard to remember the (correct) broader definition when slop is being shoved into your brain through every possible orifice. Even for us that vehemently disagree, it still subconsciously molds the frameworks and language we use. It's insidious, really. See this article by a fellow lemming which I highly recommend. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 8 months ago (2 children) Transcriptions, mostly decent. Yup, quite good Notes and summaries? It works mostly to shrink the meaning. Something that LLMs are trained for in the first place. And that's all. 2 separate steps that are both good and reliable to an extent. One of the best applications of ai so far permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 child) There was someone at work who was using read.ai for technical discussion and the few summaries I read were like someone who didn't understand the topic and couldn't tell what details were important. We would summarize the decisions and next steps and each one had at least one really important thing changed or left out. A transcription getting words wrong but still phonetically right is still more helpful than a misleading summary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 point 8 months ago Not if you care about accuracy. Now I understand the last part. Agreed, something deeply specialized could be in danger here. I had corpo speak in mind writing the previous messages permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 7 points 8 months ago (3 children) And transcriptions usually aren't really even AI; speech-to-text has been around a while. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children) Speech to text is AI and always has been. It wasn't always the current LLM slop bots that coopted the name, sure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cravl@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago You're 100% right, and I should know that too. “Not LLM-based” is indeed what I was intending to say. It gets hard to remember the (correct) broader definition when slop is being shoved into your brain through every possible orifice. Even for us that vehemently disagree, it still subconsciously molds the frameworks and language we use. It's insidious, really. See this article by a fellow lemming which I highly recommend. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children) Speech to text is AI and always has been. It wasn't always the current LLM slop bots that coopted the name, sure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cravl@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago You're 100% right, and I should know that too. “Not LLM-based” is indeed what I was intending to say. It gets hard to remember the (correct) broader definition when slop is being shoved into your brain through every possible orifice. Even for us that vehemently disagree, it still subconsciously molds the frameworks and language we use. It's insidious, really. See this article by a fellow lemming which I highly recommend. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago You're 100% right, and I should know that too. “Not LLM-based” is indeed what I was intending to say. It gets hard to remember the (correct) broader definition when slop is being shoved into your brain through every possible orifice. Even for us that vehemently disagree, it still subconsciously molds the frameworks and language we use. It's insidious, really. See this article by a fellow lemming which I highly recommend. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 8 months ago (2 children) Transcriptions, mostly decent. Yup, quite good Notes and summaries? It works mostly to shrink the meaning. Something that LLMs are trained for in the first place. And that's all. 2 separate steps that are both good and reliable to an extent. One of the best applications of ai so far permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 child) There was someone at work who was using read.ai for technical discussion and the few summaries I read were like someone who didn't understand the topic and couldn't tell what details were important. We would summarize the decisions and next steps and each one had at least one really important thing changed or left out. A transcription getting words wrong but still phonetically right is still more helpful than a misleading summary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 point 8 months ago Not if you care about accuracy. Now I understand the last part. Agreed, something deeply specialized could be in danger here. I had corpo speak in mind writing the previous messages permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 child) There was someone at work who was using read.ai for technical discussion and the few summaries I read were like someone who didn't understand the topic and couldn't tell what details were important. We would summarize the decisions and next steps and each one had at least one really important thing changed or left out. A transcription getting words wrong but still phonetically right is still more helpful than a misleading summary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 point 8 months ago Not if you care about accuracy. Now I understand the last part. Agreed, something deeply specialized could be in danger here. I had corpo speak in mind writing the previous messages permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 point 8 months ago Not if you care about accuracy. Now I understand the last part. Agreed, something deeply specialized could be in danger here. I had corpo speak in mind writing the previous messages permalink fedilink source parent